- Case involves a Hedging Adjustment Payment made by the taxpayer to the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management
- The payment is not considered a negative component of the taxable services provided by the taxpayer under the DBFM agreement
- The payment is a separate agreement to cover interest rate risks and is not directly related to the services provided under the DBFM agreement
- The payment is settled separately from availability fees and is related to interest rates, not the services provided
- The payment is not considered a consideration for any services under the VAT law
- The appeal is deemed unfounded and the lower court’s decision is upheld
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Internet consultation on new VAT rules for platform economy starting July 2028
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025