- Case involves a Hedging Adjustment Payment made by the taxpayer to the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management
- The payment is not considered a negative component of the taxable services provided by the taxpayer under the DBFM agreement
- The payment is a separate agreement to cover interest rate risks and is not directly related to the services provided under the DBFM agreement
- The payment is settled separately from availability fees and is related to interest rates, not the services provided
- The payment is not considered a consideration for any services under the VAT law
- The appeal is deemed unfounded and the lower court’s decision is upheld
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026













