- A taxpayer (X) has been issued a tax assessment with a penalty for VAT.
- It was found in an audit that invoices for rental of storage space were issued to a foundation by company B.
- The tax authority argues that X is not the recipient of these services and therefore not entitled to deduct input VAT.
- The court ruled in favor of the tax authority, stating that the deduction of input VAT was correctly corrected and the penalty is appropriate.
- The higher court (Hof Den Haag) confirms the ruling of the lower court.
- X has not provided sufficient evidence that there was an option for taxable rental in the written agreement.
- The option for taxable rental agreed between B and A (the director of the foundation) cannot be applied to the agreement between B and X.
- Therefore, VAT was incorrectly charged on the rent and X wrongly deducted input VAT on the invoices.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Principle of legitimate expectations prevents additional VAT assessment of contractors
- VAT-Exempt Rental of Padel and Squash Courts?
- AG: No VAT Education Exemption for Foundation Lending Teachers
- Netherlands Plans Peppol-Based E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Under ViDA
- May 2026 NPa Validation Artefacts for SI-UBL 2 / NLCIUS and Peppol BIS 3 – Mandatory from 17 August 2026













