The Court of Appeal of ‘s-Hertogenbosch ruled that X’s application for a refund of wrongly invoiced VAT in 2011 is not possible because X did not pay VAT on the tax return. The court found that the application cannot be based on Article 29 of the VAT Act 1968 because the buses were never delivered to BCL cv. The court dismissed the appeal as unfounded, declared the objection inadmissible, and concluded that X should apply to the civil courts.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No VAT group according to AG due to lack of financial interconnectedness
- VAT in 2026: mark these deadlines in your calendar
- Supreme Court Upholds Additional VAT Assessment Due to Insufficient Proof Against Revenue Reconstruction
- Tourist Tax Included in VAT Base for Campsite Services, Supreme Court Rules
- Majority Shareholding and Fiscal Unity: Assessing Financial Interdependence Among Collaborating Shareholder Groups
