- The case involves a dispute over a VAT assessment for the year 2016.
- The VAT assessment is based on a balance debt of VAT that arose from the company’s own records.
- The balance debt was incurred due to the purchase of watches in Spain with Spanish VAT, which were then sold in the Netherlands under the wrong tax scheme.
- The Spanish tax authorities rejected the request for a refund of the Spanish VAT.
- The court cannot provide a solution to the taxpayers’ appeal, as it would mean the end of their business and income.
- The court determines that the VAT assessment is correct based on the balance debt.
- The taxpayers argue that the balance debt should have been written off, as their accountant did for the year 2015.
- The court finds that the agreement with the tax authorities only applies to the period up to 2015 and does not include the first quarter of 2016.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.