- X is a dealer of exclusive Mercedes cars and uses a hire-purchase construction.
- X applied the zero rate incorrectly for the sale of one car and is therefore liable for €12,699 in VAT.
- The court ruled that X is a VAT entrepreneur and is entitled to a refund of the VAT charged to her.
- The court accepted X’s claim for internal compensation, reducing the tax assessment to €12,699.
- The penalty was annulled because it was imposed in violation of the ne bis in idem principle.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
