The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X bv is not a VAT entrepreneur and the reverse charge mechanism does not apply to services charged to X bv. The loans were not provided on a commercial basis and there is no economic activity. As a result, the additional tax assessment imposed on X bv was deemed to be wrongly imposed.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands: Shadow Accounting Triggers Reversed Burden of Proof and VAT Assessments
- Netherlands: FIOD Arrests Man in €240,000 EU VAT Carousel Fraud Probe
- Dutch entrepreneur disputes €33,000 VAT debt in accountant disciplinary case
- Netherlands Urged to Speed Up E-Invoicing to Combat VAT Fraud
- Netherlands: VAT Assessment on Furnished Holiday Rentals and Small Business Scheme Misuse
