The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal rules that the additional VAT assessment was rightly imposed on B bv and that X as director was rightly held liable for it. The recipient makes it plausible that only B bv has entered into legal relationships for the deliveries of the telephones with encryption software and the SIM cards. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No reliance on tax adviser where VAT invoices were not provided on time
- No VAT Invoice Filing, No Appeal to the Adviser
- Export VAT Zero Rate for Horse Sale Upheld Despite Delayed EU Exit
- Pension Fund Not Qualifying as Common Investment Fund, VAT Exemption Denied
- VAT’s Impact on Dutch WOZ Property Valuation
