- MJL Contracts Ltd incurred a 2% default surcharge for late payment of £36,038
- They argued that the surcharge could only be imposed if they failed to submit their VAT return or if HMRC issued a VAT assessment
- The Upper Tribunal ruled that the surcharge was imposed simply because of MJL’s failure to pay on time
- MJL also argued that the surcharge had to be imposed by an assessment under s.76 VATA and required an HMRC officer to consider it
- The UT rejected this argument and stated that HMRC can make decisions about default surcharges on a generic basis and automate the process
- MJL’s appeal was dismissed.
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Deductibility for Professional Fees in Share Sale Transactions
- UK Tribunal Rules Personalized Book Services VAT-Exempt as Primary Supply is Book Production
- 2025: Celebrity Traitors, Trump’s Tariffs, and the Year Tax Law Got Even Weirder
- UK to Mandate B2B E-Invoicing for All VAT Invoices Starting April 2029
- Audit Office Monitors Council’s VAT Filing Amid Potential £600k HMRC Fine Risk














