- The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in a case involving the option to tax, undeclared output tax, and a personal liability notice.
- The Tribunal found that “blind-eye knowledge” (willful ignorance) was sufficient to conclude the inaccuracy was deliberate.
- The case highlights that failing to ask obvious questions can be as risky as knowingly ignoring the truth.
Source: deeksvat.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- VAT Road Fuel Scale Charges for Private Use: 1 May 2026 to 30 April 2027
- FTT Partially Allows VAT Fraud Appeals: Director’s Unsophistication Mitigates Penalties in AAMRL Case
- UK Opens Second Consultation on CBAM Regulations; Feedback Due by May 21, 2026
- Which Delivery Costs to Include in Customs Value for Importers and Clearing Agents
- New VAT Relief for Business Donations to Charities Effective April 2026: No Charge on Gifts














