- The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in a case involving the option to tax, undeclared output tax, and a personal liability notice.
- The Tribunal found that “blind-eye knowledge” (willful ignorance) was sufficient to conclude the inaccuracy was deliberate.
- The case highlights that failing to ask obvious questions can be as risky as knowingly ignoring the truth.
Source: deeksvat.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Policy paper: VAT treatment of certain public funds received by further education institutions
- VAT Liability on Mobile Bundles Heads to Court of Appeal: Lycamobile Case
- UK Suspends VAT on Free Post-Trial Drugs After Pharma Backlash Over Research Impact
- Isle of Man Introduces VAT Relief for Business Donations to Registered Charities
- New Rules for Customs Duty Repayment Schemes in Northern Ireland Effective May 2026













