A bv produces and sells skin care products. It applies the 9% rate. The inspector considers that this rate does not apply to these resources and imposes a VAT additional assessment. The Supreme Court rules that EU member states may selectively apply the 9% rate, unless this is contrary to the principle of neutrality. The OB Act distinguishes between registered medicines (9% rate) and medical devices (21% rate). The bv’s skin care products fall into the category of medical devices. But does this distinction lead to a violation of the principle of neutrality?
Source: www.fiscount.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Deduction Denied Without Invoices in Zeeland-West-Brabant Tax Case
- Ledger cards insufficient for input VAT deduction
- Court Affirms Non-Deductibility of Input VAT on Catering and Other Non-Business Costs
- VAT Deduction Correction on Unbusinesslike Costs Mostly Upheld
- VAT Deduction Denied for Unproven Invoiced Services
