- A company sold a car to its DGA for a very low price, resulting in the inspector imposing an additional turnover tax assessment and a misdemeanor fine.
- The North Holland District Court disagreed with the inspector’s opinion that VAT is due on the disguised dividend and that the criminal fine was correctly imposed.
- The court stated that VAT should only be based on the invoice amount, and there was an abuse of law as the company only used the car for business for a short time and then sold it to the DGA for an artificially low price to obtain a tax benefit.
- The disguised dividend payment was counted as part of what the DGA actually sacrificed to get the car.
- The court quashed the offense fine as there is an arguable point of view.
Source Taxence
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Are Practice Nurses Eligible for VAT Exemption on Medical Services?
- How to Use OSS VAT for EU E-commerce When Shipping from a Dutch Warehouse
- VAT levy on data for ‘free’ social media services: The Netherlands is waiting for Europe
- The Netherlands: Comprehensive VAT Country Guide (2026)
- Zero VAT Rate Denied: Inadequate KYC and Buffers Lead to Knowledge of VAT Fraud in Metal Trade
