- The Belgian Supreme Court recently made an important ruling regarding the limitation period for import VAT and anti-dumping duties.
- The case involved SA Thyssenkrupp Materials Belgium, which submitted irregular import declarations for goods without disclosing the Chinese origin of the imported goods.
- The tax authorities claimed that the company owed significant anti-dumping duties and import VAT charges.
- The taxpayer contested the import VAT claim, and the case went to court.
- The Liège Court of Appeal upheld the tax authority’s claim, and the case was brought before the Supreme Court.
- The Supreme Court ruled that an irregular VAT return does not automatically extend the statute of limitations for enforcement.
- This ruling clarifies that an irregular VAT return is not equivalent to a failure to file a return and will serve as an important precedent in future disputes involving import VAT assessments based on extended limitation periods.
Source VATconsult
Latest Posts in "Belgium"
- Belgium Delays VAT Rate Hike for Hospitality and Leisure Sectors Until March 2026
- VAT rate increases postponed till March 1, 2026
- ecosio Webinar – E-invoicing in Belgium: What You Need to Know (Dec 11)
- Belgium Sets 2026 Deadline for Mandatory B2B E-Invoicing, 2028 for E-Reporting Compliance
- Belgium’s 2026 B2B E-Invoicing Mandate: Key Rules, Grace Period, and Compliance Details













