The Court of Justice of the EU rules that the provision of spa facilities by Gemeinde A does not constitute a ‘service for consideration’ if the levying of tourist tax is not linked to the use of these facilities, but to the stay on the territory of the municipality.
Source Taxlive
See also
- C-344/22 (Gemeinde A)- Judgment – Access for free to spa facilities is not a taxable transaction if remuneration is a tourist tax
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Public bodies” (Art. 13)
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Ine Lejeune/Herman van Kesteren analyse EGC T-221/25 (TUI): ”Implicit VAT Legislation, Legal Certainty and the Right to Property”
- Advocate General Advises EU Court Referral on VAT for Pension Contributions
- EU Strengthens Cross-Border Fight Against VAT Fraud
- CJEU Stellantis Judgment Clarifies VAT Treatment of Transfer Pricing Adjustments
- Comments on ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – Transfer pricing and VAT: Court confirms in Stellantis that not every true-up constitutes a service
