- The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal failed to address X bv’s claim that there is an arguable point of view with regard to the fine.
- The court upheld the decision with regard to the fine and pointed out that there was reasonable doubt about the starting point for VAT reclamation during the period in question. X bv operates a computer wholesaler and claimed approximately € 5.2 million in input VAT from 2007-2010.
- The inspector found that X bv was not entitled to deduct input tax for purchases prior to ICLs to so-called ‘missing traders’ from various countries, resulting in an additional VAT assessment of € 33.7 million and a fine.
- The District Court of Noord-Holland nullified the additional tax assessment, but the inspector appealed and the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam reduced the assessment.
- X bv appealed in cassation, arguing that the Court of Appeal failed to address essential assertions regarding the fine. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of X bv’s appeal in cassation.
Source Taxlive