The court rules that the conversion of an old office building into a hotel is not so far-reaching that it has created an essentially new building. The court will not ask preliminary questions. Article 12, second paragraph, second paragraph, VAT Directive 2006 has no direct effect and the court has not seen any indications why its implementation in Dutch legislation would be incorrect.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands: Shadow Accounting Triggers Reversed Burden of Proof and VAT Assessments
- Netherlands: FIOD Arrests Man in €240,000 EU VAT Carousel Fraud Probe
- Dutch entrepreneur disputes €33,000 VAT debt in accountant disciplinary case
- Netherlands Urged to Speed Up E-Invoicing to Combat VAT Fraud
- Netherlands: VAT Assessment on Furnished Holiday Rentals and Small Business Scheme Misuse
