The Supreme Court recently ruled in a case in which an auction house auctioned used household goods, art and antiques and the like and charged a fee for this to both the seller (commission) and the buyer (buyer). It follows from this judgment that an auction house owes VAT on both the commissions and the premiums it charges.
Source BTW Instituut
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
- No VAT Fiscal Unity: Foundation and BV Lack Required Financial Interdependence, Court Rules
- No Breach of Legitimate Expectation in VAT Reassessment for Foundation X, Court Rules
- No VAT group due to lack of majority of material control
- No taxable transaction for test placement of showjumping horses
