The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court ruled that X acted as a VAT entrepreneur when the building site was delivered. According to the Court of Appeal, the work performed by X can be compared to that of a trader. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Appeal on Excise Duty Assessment: Disclosure of Documents, Tax Liability, and Correctness of Tax Assessment
- Appeal to 35-year-old agreements does not inspire confidence that VAT is deductible
- No excusable delay in the event of late VAT refund requests
- Pension fund provides VAT-exempt insurance services during the performance of the benefit agreement
- Additional VAT Assessments Upheld; Misdemeanor Fines Dismissed
