The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court ruled that X acted as a VAT entrepreneur when the building site was delivered. According to the Court of Appeal, the work performed by X can be compared to that of a trader. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Senate accepts bill to retain reduced VAT rate on culture, media and sports
- VAT on residential rent by foreign temporary workers not deductible
- Dutch Court Rules Outsourced Payment Processing Qualifies for VAT Exemption
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Head Spa Treatments at Hairdressers, Dutch Tax Group Rules
- Netherlands Plans Mandatory Peppol-Based B2B E-Invoicing Regime by July 2030
