The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that only changes in the structural construction (bouwkundige constructie) of an existing building can lead to the conclusion that a refurbishment was so significant that essentially a new building is constructed. In this blog post Ashley Peeters and Johan Vrolijk describe the ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court, why the Dutch real estate market was looking forward to this ruling and the implications thereof.
Source: stibbe.com
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Ryan Acquires Svalner Atlas in Major European Tax Expansion
- State Secretary Sees No Major Problems for Floriculture Sector from Higher VAT
- Principle of legitimate expectations prevents additional VAT assessment of contractors
- VAT-Exempt Rental of Padel and Squash Courts?
- AG: No VAT Education Exemption for Foundation Lending Teachers
