The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad held that no demand can be made for extended period of limitation when no intention to evade payment of service tax. M/s. Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd, the appellant has filed the appeal to assail the order dated passed by the Commissioner of Central Tax, by which the demand has been confirmed and an order for recovery from the appellant under the proviso to action 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 with interest and penalty.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- Insurance Brokers Push for Zero-Rated GST to Restore Input Tax Credit and Prevent Premium Hikes
- Delhi High Court: ITC Re-credit Cannot Be Denied Due to GST Portal Technical Limitations
- Key GST and Customs Legal Updates: E-Filing, ITC, Refunds, and Recent High Court Judgments
- CBIC to Slash Customs Clearance Time to 1-48 Hours with New Integrated Digital System
- GSTAT E-Filing: Staggered Appeal Timelines and Limitation Rules Under Section 112 Simplified
