A has had a new house built on which 97 (integrated) solar panels (energy-generating roof tiles) have been installed. The power not used by A is supplied to the power company. A has objected to the refund decision and requested an additional refund of € 5,674 for the construction costs of the house. The IRS rejected the appeal.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
