The Gelderland District Court ruled that X cannot be regarded as a VAT entrepreneur with regard to the sale of the house. X’s VAT entrepreneurship ended in 2012, after the departure of the tenant of the office building.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Additional VAT Assessment for Private Use of Company Cars Upheld, but Penalty Reduced
- Office-to-Hotel Conversion Does Not Create a Newly Manufactured Building for VAT Purposes
- Margin Scheme Cannot Apply to Returned Goods Where Input VAT Was Deducted
- VAT Assessment for Private Use of Company Cars; Penalty Reduced from 80% to 25%
- Dutch VAT Reform Clarifies Reverse Charge Rules Under ViDA Directive
