The Gelderland District Court ruled that X cannot be regarded as a VAT entrepreneur with regard to the sale of the house. X’s VAT entrepreneurship ended in 2012, after the departure of the tenant of the office building.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Reduces Additional VAT Assessment for Car Dealer Due to Margin Scheme Application Dispute
- Supreme Court: intermission drink should be taxed separately for VAT purposes
- Provision of accommodation to employees is service for consideration
- Access to the park performance qualifies as granting access to the cinema. Reduced VAT rate applies.
- Extension of a reasonable period if the representative is insufficiently available for hearings?
