This case highlights issues around applying place of supply rules and also briefly discusses abuse of rights. Whilst the Advocate General’s opinion issued earlier this year indicated that part of the role of the CJEU was to resolve conflicts such as those arising in this case, even if it meant pronouncing on questions such as whether an abuse of law had, in fact, taken place, the Court in the end declined to comment on the correct VAT treatment of this supply.
Source Constable
See also See also ECJ C-596/20 (DuoDecad) – Judgment – ECJ has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – C-603/24 (Stellantis) judgment on May 13, 2026
- New ECJ VAT Case: C-413/26 (Prodalco Mat) – No details known yet
- EPPO 2025 Annual Report: Key Customs Enforcement Trends, Fraud Schemes, and Cross-Border Actions
- EU Agrees to Give Anti-Fraud Bodies Wider, Direct Access to VAT Data to Combat Cross-Border Fraud
- EU Adopts New Data Sharing Rules to Combat Billion-Euro Cross-Border VAT Fraud
