What limits do the structural principles of Union law set for procedural autonomy in the member states? In any case, the procedural modalities of the Member States for enforcing the VAT refund claim must not be less favorable than the national procedural law that applies to other types of tax.
Background
The right to a refund of excess VAT arises when the amount of input VAT exceeds the amount of VAT due for a period. Member States can carry over the surplus to the following period or refund it according to the conditions they set. The implementation of the right to reimbursement of the VAT surplus falls within the procedural autonomy of the Member States. According to established ECJ case law, procedural autonomy is limited by the principles of equivalence, effectiveness and protection of legitimate expectations under Union law (ECJ, judgment of May 12, 2011, C-107/10, Enel Maritsa Iztok 3, para. 29; judgment of 21.01.2010, C-472/08, Alstom Power Hydro, paragraph 17; judgment of 11.07.2002, C-62/00, Marks & Spencer, paragraph 44).
Source Deloitte
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Protects Luxembourg Directors’ Right to Challenge Company VAT Assessments
- EU Court: Post-Assignment Credit Management Services Are VAT Taxable
- Shadow Economy and Governance Effects on EU VAT Compliance Gaps, 2013–2023
- EPPO Charges Six Over €17.4 Million Czech VAT Fraud Scheme
- €17.4m VAT Fraud Linked to China Imports Uncovered in Czechia
