As expected, the decision has been aligned with the ruling of the Court of Justice of 11 March 2021, C-812/19 (Danske Bank). For example, services between a head office and a permanent establishment fall within the scope of VAT from the date of entry into force if one of the two establishments is part of a fiscal unity in a Member State of the European Union. If both branches are not part of a fiscal unity, the “old” principle of the ECJ FCE Bank will continue to apply and services between the various branches will fall outside the scope of VAT.
Source Deloitte
See also
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
- No VAT Fiscal Unity: Foundation and BV Lack Required Financial Interdependence, Court Rules
- No Breach of Legitimate Expectation in VAT Reassessment for Foundation X, Court Rules
- No VAT group due to lack of majority of material control
