The Supreme Court has dismissed Zipvit Ltd’s appeal concerning the recovery of input tax on services that the Royal Mail had incorrectly treated as exempt, applying the explanation provided by the CJEU in January. In order for Zipvit to be able to recover input tax, VAT must have been “due” or “paid”.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Guidance: Domestic reverse charge procedure (VAT Notice 735)
- Tribunal Finds Blind-Eye Knowledge Equals Deliberate Inaccuracy in Option to Tax Case
- Sonder Appeal Postponed: Court Grants Stay Amid Funding and Precedent Uncertainty
- Tribunal Rules Nursery Hot Meal Supplies Are Standard-Rated Catering, Not Zero-Rated Food
- Access Cards for Disabled Users Qualify for VAT Zero-Rating, Tribunal Rules
