The Supreme Court has dismissed Zipvit Ltd’s appeal concerning the recovery of input tax on services that the Royal Mail had incorrectly treated as exempt, applying the explanation provided by the CJEU in January. In order for Zipvit to be able to recover input tax, VAT must have been “due” or “paid”.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Campaign Urges Government to Remove VAT on Children’s Oral Hygiene Products to Tackle Tooth Decay
- UK Budget 2025: VAT E-Invoicing, Digital Compliance, and Post-Brexit Tax Reforms Announced
- FTT Rules HMRC Closure Notice Bars VAT Registration: Hairdresser’s Turnover Below Threshold, Appeal Allowed
- UK Tribunal Rules Self-Employed Hairdresser Not Liable for VAT Registration Under Rent-a-Chair Model
- EU Insists on VAT Representative for UK Firms Despite British Objections to Import Rules
