The case analysed by the Advocate General refers to chain transactions occurred before the implementation of the so-called quick fixes introduced by EU Directive 2018/1910. The questions asked by the Polish referring court refers to the first sale performed by the Dutch intermediary company (B) which considered the acquisition from BOP as a Polish domestic sale, subject to local VAT while the local court believed that transport of goods should have been allocated to that sale meant as the only intra-Community supply.
Source DLA Piper
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Germany: Two Convicted in €200 Million VAT Fraud and Hawala Money Laundering Scheme
- EU Triple-Chain VAT Invoice Correction Case in Austria
- VATupdate’s Free Interactive Tool: ECJ & General Court VAT Case Finder: 1,315 VAT cases searchable by article, sub-article, topic and status
- VATupdate’s Free Interactive Tool: EU E-Invoicing & E-Reporting Matrix – Check Every Scenario, in Every Member State
- EGC Customs T-28/25 (Hauptzollamt A) : AG Includes Design Costs and Component Buying Commissions in Customs Value
