The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court rules that X bv is not entitled to deduct the VAT stated in the notarial deed. The witness statements show that X bv, director I and the civil-law notary have set up a construction to obtain a tax advantage fraudulently. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands: Supreme Court rules on VAT-taxable rental of home office room
- Netherlands Adopts ViDA VAT Registration Rules
- Netherlands: Residential Use Blocks VAT-Taxed Rental of Home Office
- Residential use prevents VAT-taxed rental of office
- Netherlands: Privacy Justifies Secrecy of Third-Party Data in VAT Refund Case
