The fact that BV X was obliged to observe secrecy with regard to that which was entrusted to it in the context of the performance of its duties as a tax adviser was also of no benefit to it in view of Article 51 of the AWR,
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Case Study: Multi-Country VAT Registration for US Sellers Expanding in Europe
- White goods trader wrongly applies margin scheme to goods purchased in Germany
- Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Deliberate VAT Fraud Despite Acquittal on Criminal Organisation Charge
- Court Confirms VAT Medical Exemption for Commercial At‑Home Testing Services
- VAT Margin Scheme Did Not Apply to the Sale of White Goods Purchased in Germany
