The relevance of the concept of fixed establishment (FE) for the EU VAT system can hardly be over-stated. Similarly to the concept of permanent establishment (PE) for income taxes purposes, the term plays a central role in VAT, and is consistently relied upon by the legislator, for both determining the place of supply of services, and establishing the right to deduct input VAT. Yet, despite its significance, the term is far from clear, and in recent years, the debate over its definition and scope, primarily in the context of our global digital economy, has intensified. This paper considers the evolution of the concept of FE in EU VAT and the recent CJEU decision in Titanium in the context of the Court’s previous case law.
Source SSRN
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- European Commission Proposes “EU Inc.”: A Unified Digital Corporate Form to Boost Cross-Border Business
- EU-Australia Free Trade Deal Boosts Exports, Faces Criticism Over Agricultural Quotas and Protections
- Chinese Nationals Charged in Germany for €630,000 Aluminium Foil Anti-Dumping Duty Evasion
- EU VAT Committee Limits Taxation of Free Social Media Access in Exchange for User Data
- EU VAT Data Exchange Divides Members, Hindering Digital Tax Future
