A has appealed [tax office x]’s binding prior statement […] of 5 April 2017. [Tax office x] concluded in the BFU that a planned joint registration, where A is the reporting entity, could not demand a recurring tax settlement according to the Value Added Tax Act § 8- 6 for input VAT, which was incurred within a D-joint registration.
Source: skatteetaten.no
Latest Posts in "Norway"
- Norway Proposes VAT Reform for Cross-Border Remote Services in Multinational Groups
- Norway Expands E-Invoicing: Mandatory B2B Digital Invoices and Bookkeeping by 2030
- Norway Expands VAT to Remotely Supplied Services Used in Norway Effective July 2026
- Norway Implements Temporary Fuel Tax Cuts Following Parliamentary Decision
- Norway to Mandate Digital Bookkeeping and E-Invoicing for Businesses Starting 2027
