A has appealed [tax office x]’s binding prior statement […] of 5 April 2017. [Tax office x] concluded in the BFU that a planned joint registration, where A is the reporting entity, could not demand a recurring tax settlement according to the Value Added Tax Act § 8- 6 for input VAT, which was incurred within a D-joint registration.
Source: skatteetaten.no
Latest Posts in "Norway"
- Norway 2026 Budget: VAT Changes, Electric Car Exemption Cut, CO2 Tax Increase Approved
- How to Verify Norwegian VAT Numbers Online: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses and Individuals
- Norway to Gradually End VAT Exemption for Electric Cars Starting 2026
- Key VAT Changes in 2026 Budget: Electric Cars, International Services, and Related Company Deductions
- 2026 Budget: EV Subsidy Phase-Out and Cross-Border Service Tax Tightening