A has appealed [tax office x]’s binding prior statement […] of 5 April 2017. [Tax office x] concluded in the BFU that a planned joint registration, where A is the reporting entity, could not demand a recurring tax settlement according to the Value Added Tax Act § 8- 6 for input VAT, which was incurred within a D-joint registration.
Source: skatteetaten.no
Latest Posts in "Norway"
- Norway Locks In Mandatory B2B E-Invoicing: What the 2027 Start Really Means for Businesses
- Norway — SAF-T Financial v1.40 mandatory from 1 January 2027
- Guide on E-Invoicing and E-Reporting in Norway
- Norway Accelerates E-Invoicing, VAT Reporting and SAF-T Compliance
- Norway — Tax Commission Proposes to Merge Reduced VAT Rates and Broaden the VAT Base
