A has appealed [tax office x]’s binding prior statement […] of 5 April 2017. [Tax office x] concluded in the BFU that a planned joint registration, where A is the reporting entity, could not demand a recurring tax settlement according to the Value Added Tax Act § 8- 6 for input VAT, which was incurred within a D-joint registration.
Source: skatteetaten.no
Latest Posts in "Norway"
- Norway: Data Center Services Deemed Multiple Supplies for VAT, Not a Single Unified Supply
- Norway Requires Split VAT for Data Center Services to Foreign Customers With Customer-Owned Servers
- Norway Clarifies VAT Rules for Data Center Services Provided to Nonresidents
- Government Proposes Mandatory E-Invoicing and Other Financial Market Law Changes from 2027
- Norway plans mandatory B2B e‑invoicing from 2027 and full digital bookkeeping by 2030
