According to the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal had insufficiently motivated its decision that the 39 VAT returns not mentioned in the indictment and the proven statement could be regarded as circumstances under which the five incorrect VAT returns referred to in the proven statement were made and that as a result the other reports showed the large-scale nature of the proven tax offenses
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT on Management Services for CDC Pension Fund: Not a Common Investment Fund, Appeal Dismissed
- Court Upholds Fine for Late VAT Filing; Objection Partially Granted, Penalty Deemed Appropriate
- VAT Zero Rate Denied for Export of Horse Shares: Appeal Unsuccessful, Tax Assessment Upheld
- VAT Exemption Denied for Services to Pension Funds with CDC and DC Schemes, Court Rules
- VAT Exemption for Pension Fund Management: Distinction Between Accumulation and Payout Phases Disputed
