According to the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal had insufficiently motivated its decision that the 39 VAT returns not mentioned in the indictment and the proven statement could be regarded as circumstances under which the five incorrect VAT returns referred to in the proven statement were made and that as a result the other reports showed the large-scale nature of the proven tax offenses
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Supreme Court Rules GP’s Services to Foundation Not Exempt from VAT
- Dutch Supreme Court Ruling: VAT Exemption on Integrated Primary Care Services by General Practitioners
- Court Ruling on Zero Rate Conditions for Second-Hand Car Sales and Fraud Penalties
- Dutch Government Proposes VAT Obligation for Digital Platforms Starting July 2028
- Dutch Supreme Court Rules GP Services to Partnership Not Exempt from VAT
