According to the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal had insufficiently motivated its decision that the 39 VAT returns not mentioned in the indictment and the proven statement could be regarded as circumstances under which the five incorrect VAT returns referred to in the proven statement were made and that as a result the other reports showed the large-scale nature of the proven tax offenses
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
- Comments on T-184/25: Transfers of credit portfolios and VAT: AG puts credit management exemption under pressure
- New Four-Year VAT Adjustment for Investment Services on Real Estate Starting 2026
- VAT refund rightly refused due to unproven previous payment
- VAT Rules for Unpaid Invoices: When Can Entrepreneurs Reclaim or Repay VAT?
