The nonresident entity was using the factory, warehouse, and premises of the Spanish subsidiary and was even providing instructions to the subsidiary’s employees. In addition, the Swiss entity assumed all the risks. The court concluded that the Spanish subsidiary was a permanent establishment in Spain for VAT purposes and was required to charge Spanish VAT on its sales in Spain.
Source: Deloitte
See also THIS post about this case.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- The standstill clause tested: advocate general’s view on Spanish VAT deduction restrictions
- VAT IT eezi webinar – European E-Invoicing Spotlight: Greece, Poland, Croatia & Spain (Nov 27)
- New Versions of CAU Temporary Storage Technical Guides G3v2, G4, and G5v2 Released
- Criteria for Determining Supervising Customs Office in Simplified Authorization Cases for Inward Processing
- Briefing document & Podcast: Spain – E-Invoicing, E-Reporting, and E-Transport Regulations
