Daan Arends and Sebastiaan Wijsman of DLA Piper Netherlands explain how a recent judgment by the ECJ broadens the opportunities to recover VAT on costs incurred in the case of unrealised transactions.
Source: internationaltaxreview.com
For other articles about the ECJ C-42/19 Sonaecom case, please use this LINK.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- The EU Commission proposes new collaborative measures in view of ViDA
- How did the EU Member States implemented ”Domestic Reverse-Charge” (Art. 194 of the Directive 2006/112)?
- ECJ/General Court VAT Cases – Pending cases
- ECJ VAT Cases decided in 2025
- Comments on GC T-657/24: VAT exemption for credit intermediation applies when the intermediary searches for and recruits customers
