The main amendments to the decision:
– the impact of the Skandia judgment on the vat charge on the mutual performance between the main house and the v.i.,
– the effect of the Morgan Stanley judgment on the deduction of VAT on costs incurred at a permanent establishment in the Netherlands,
– the diversion of VAT on services which purchase a ‘purchase FE’ for themselves and on the spot,
– cases where the FE in the Netherlands is ‘involved’ in the performance of a foreign main house, and
– explanation when determining which device (the main house or the v.i.) a service purchases
Source
- Staatscourant (in Dutch) – Jeroen Bijl (EY)
- Loyens Loeff
See also
- ECJ – C-7/13 (Skandia) – Supply of services between head office and branch part of VAT group constitutes a taxable transaction
- ECJ – C-165/17 (Morgan Stanley) – Judgment – VAT deduction by branches rendering services to their head-office
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Fixed Establishments”
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Land Development VAT and Transfer Tax: How Things Can Go Wrong
- Squash and Padel Court Rentals Are VAT-Exempt
- VAT Deduction Denied; Penalty Reduced Over Reconciliation Differences
- Dutch Court Rules on Own-Building Status in Renovation Works VAT Case
- Hague Court of Appeal Upholds VAT Appeal Admissibility and Legitimate Expectations
