VATupdate

Share this post on

ECJ – 4 decisions on Dec 17, 2020, AG Opinion removed – Agenda for week of Jan 11, 2021 released

December 17, 2020

Judgment in C-346/19 (Bundeszentralamt für Steuern)

VAT refunds to non-resident taxable persons; content of application; invoice number

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

 

Judgment in C-656/19 (Bakati Plus)

VAT exemption for ‘personal luggage’

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

 

Judgment in C-449/19 (WEG Tevesstraße)

Exemption for letting of immovable property — National provision exempting the supply of heat by an association of property owners to those owners

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

 

Judgment in C-801/19 (Franck)

VAT Exemption for Financial Activities – Whether the provision of funds by the applicant, who is not a financial institution, against payment of a one-off fee of 1% of the amount of money provided are regarded as’ granting of credits and the credit brokerage, and […] credit management by those who have it granted “within the meaning of the VAT Directive, even if the requesting party is not formally referred to as the lender. Whether order notes must be considered as negotiable instruments Whether the service of the applicant can qualify as a service within the meaning of Article 135 (1) (b) and (d) of the VAT Directive.

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

 

AG Opinion in C-844/19 (TechnoRent) – REMOVED form the most recent calendar

Interest on VAT refunds: An Austrian referral asking whether EU law permits a taxpayer to claim interest where the tax authorities fail to process a VAT refund in good time, even though national law does not provide for such an interest payment? When does the interest begin to accrue?

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

January 14, 2021

AG Opinion in C-846/19 Administration de l’Enregistrement, des Domaines and de la TVA

A Luxembourg referral asking whether, inter alia, the concept of taxable activity within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 9(1) of the VAT Directive is to be interpreted as including or excluding supplies of services provided in the context of a ‘triangular relationship’ in which the provider of the services is appointed to provide those services by an entity which is not the same person as the recipient of the supply?

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

 

AG Opinion in C-4/20 ALTI

Does the joint liability of a customer for unpaid VAT by the supplier also include default interest?

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sponsors:

VAT news
VAT news

Advertisements:

  • AXWAY - VATupdate Banner
  • VATupdate.com
  • vatcomsult