The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has recently held that service tax cannot be imposed on Coca Cola Franchisee for the promotional activities carried out under the Bottler’s Agreement since these activities are not covered under the ambit of “Business Auxiliary Services.”
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- Corporate guarantee without consideration among group entities falls outside the ambit of GST
- When Supplier Defaults, Recipient Loses GST ITC: Conflicting High Court Rulings and Legal Analysis
- GSTN Launches Offline Invoice Management System (IMS) Tool; Issues Detailed User Advisory
- SEBI Asks GST Council to Resolve Tax Issues in Physically Settled Commodity Derivatives
- No Reverse Charge Demand if Service Provider Has Fully Paid Service Tax: CESTAT Hyderabad
