The Customs, Excises, and Service Taxes Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the CENVAT Credit cannot be denied on sales commission as it falls under the definition of “input service.” The Appellants, Federal Mogul TPR (India) Ltd. are engaged in the manufacture of Pistons and rings falling under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The sales and marketing of the product are undertaken by FMGIL as per the Marketing Agency Agreement between the two units.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- GSTN Introduces E-Invoicing for Reverse Charge Self-Invoices on Domestic and Import Services
- GST Council recommends e-invoicing for reverse-charge purchases and imports of services
- GST Reform May Reclassify Services to Overseas Branches as Exports
- Five States Named Permanent Members of New GST Standing Committee
- Centre Sees Little Scope for Further GST Rate Discussions
