On 10th September, 2020, the Tax Appeal Tribunal (“TAT”) in the case of Ess-ay Holdings Limited (“Ess-ay Holdings” or “the Company”) v Federal Inland Revenue Service (“FIRS”) held that a lease of real property whether for commercial or residential purposes does not amount to a supply of goods and services and therefore not subject to Value Added Tax (VAT). In reaching its decision, the TAT held that a lease of real property amounts to a transfer of incorporeal rights which is outside the scope of the VAT Act.
Sources:
Latest Posts in "Nigeria"
- Pass-Through Costs: Tax Implications of Reimbursable Expenses for VAT and WHT in Logistics
- Is Commercial Rent Subject to VAT Under Nigeria’s 2025 Tax Act?
- Why Exporters Must Still Pay VAT on Local Purchases in Nigeria: Common Misconceptions Explained
- Nigeria Centralises VAT Collection as Customs Exits, NRS Takes Over Amid Sweeping Tax Reforms
- Nigeria VAT Compliance: Navigating TaxPro Max for Digital and Non-Resident Suppliers













