Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court, following the court, ruled that X bv performs one single (composite) supply, namely the sale of (bedroom) products. X bv has not been able to demonstrate that the reduced VAT rate applies to this service. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source: taxlive.nl (Dutch)
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
- Easily Avoiding VAT on Webshops: A Loophole Exploited by Business Accounts
