Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court, following the court, ruled that X bv performs one single (composite) supply, namely the sale of (bedroom) products. X bv has not been able to demonstrate that the reduced VAT rate applies to this service. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source: taxlive.nl (Dutch)
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- Amendments to VAT Compensation Fund Scheme for Investment Services Effective April 2026
- Court Rejects Proposed Settlement in VAT Fraud Case Due to Evidence and Sentence Concerns
- Dutch Tax Administration Update: Emergency VAT E-commerce Track Extended to 2028, Digital Mail Option in 2025
- Amendment to VAT Compensation Fund Rules for Investment Services Effective April 2026
