Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court, following the court, ruled that X bv performs one single (composite) supply, namely the sale of (bedroom) products. X bv has not been able to demonstrate that the reduced VAT rate applies to this service. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source: taxlive.nl (Dutch)
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Court Denies Input VAT Deduction for 2016 Due to Statute of Limitations Expiry
- Preliminary questions to the ECJ in VAT case on the application of the transfer of a totality of assets
- Agreements on the agreement do not lead to intermediary services for financial VAT exemption
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers VAT Exemption on Property Transfer to CJEU for Clarification
- VAT Previously Deducted Becomes Payable After Creditor Settlement, Court Rules Against X BV
