Advocate General Ettema concludes that, based on national standards, the Court of Appeal rightly upheld X bv’s appeal to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. However, because the AG is unsure whether EU law offers less protection, the AG proposes to the Supreme Court to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Shareholder Joins VAT Fiscal Unity Through Long-Term Rental to BV
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction Over Defective Invoices and Gross Negligence Penalty
- Man Arrested in €600,000 VAT Fraud Scheme
- Input VAT deduction denied where defective invoices were not supported by additional evidence
- Dutch tax office launches digital VAT mail for entrepreneurs













