Advocate General Ettema concludes that, based on national standards, the Court of Appeal rightly upheld X bv’s appeal to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. However, because the AG is unsure whether EU law offers less protection, the AG proposes to the Supreme Court to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Advocate General Advises EU Court Referral on VAT for Pension Contributions
- NOB Criticizes New ViDA VAT Rules for Unnecessary Complexity and Implementation Delays
- Dutch Court Finds VAT Fiscal Representative Requirement Discriminatory for Foreign Entrepreneurs
- NOB Criticizes New ViDA VAT Reverse Charge Rules as Unnecessarily Complex for Dutch Businesses
- Netherlands E-Invoicing: 2026 Key Dates, Compliance Layers, and Upcoming Mandates Explained
