Tag - Fixed Establishment

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Reaffirmation on the scope and concept of the “fixed establishment”

10 May 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: CJEU confirms a broad definition of a fixed establishment

06 May 2022

European Union

Comments on C-333/20: The CJEU resolved the issue of a permanent establishment for VAT purposes

29 April 2022

European Union

Comments on C-333/20: The two criteria of the ECJ to consider a Fixed Establishment

27 April 2022

European Union

Having resources at a foreign subsidiary does not lead to a permanent establishment

25 April 2022

Austria

Concept of a Fixed Establishment: The Austrian approach

25 April 2022

Poland

Concept of a Fixed Establishment: The Polish approach

25 April 2022

European Union

The EU approach on the concept of VAT FE, in particular through a subsidiary

25 April 2022

Belgium

Concept of a Fixed Establishment: the Belgian approach

25 April 2022

Denmark

Fixed Establishment: Foreign company was not liable for VAT on supplies of services relating to immovable property

23 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: CJEU ruling enhances legal certainty for taxpayers on VAT fixed establishment concept

22 April 2022

European Union

Article: Is your subsidiary a fixed establishment in disguise?

21 April 2022

European Union

Comments on C-333/20 – More clarity on the EU VAT concept of Fixed Establishment

21 April 2022

European Union

Comments on C-333/20 – VAT fixed establishment in parent-subsidiary supplies

21 April 2022

Romania

Extended practice of the tax authority to establish fixed establishments could lead to repayment over 100 million euros by ANAF

20 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Berlin Chemie judgment – Subsidiary is not a fixed establishment for VAT purposes

15 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Group company not a fixed establishment for VAT purposes, but CJEU has left the door open

15 April 2022

Belgium European Union

Growing trend whereby a foreign parent company to have a fixed establishment in Belgium through its daughter company

14 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: No fixed establishment in the Berlin Chemie case according to Court of Justice of the EU

14 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Foreign subsidiary is not a permanent establishment for VAT

14 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Place of belonging. The Berlin Chemie A Menarini case

14 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Landmark CJEU ruling – Subsidiary rendering services to its parent is not a fixed establishment of the latter

13 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Place of belonging – The Berlin Chemie A Menarini case

13 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Relations between a parent company and its subsidiary: caution with the fixed establishment in VAT

12 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: CJEU Ruling on the Concept of Fixed Establishment for VAT Purposes

12 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Group company is not a permanent establishment for VAT, but the ECJ leaves the door ajar

11 April 2022

Netherlands

Fixed Establishment For VAT Purposes

11 April 2022

European Union

Relations between a parent company and its subsidiary: attention to the fixed establishment for VAT

11 April 2022

Poland

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Experts believe that the ECJ ruling may change the restrictive approach of tax authorities to the issue of a VAT fixed establishment

11 April 2022

European Union

Comments on C-333/20: In the absence of suitable structure, German pharmaceutical in Romania does not have Fixed Establishment

11 April 2022

European Union

VAT and Fixed Establishments – An analysis by Francisco Javier Sánchez Gallardo

11 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20 (Berlin Chemie): No VAT fixed establishment in the Berlin Chemie case

11 April 2022

European Union

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Subsidiary is not a permanent establishment for VAT purposes

10 April 2022

Tag - Fixed Establishment

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Reaffirmation on the scope and concept of the “fixed establishment”

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: CJEU confirms a broad definition of a fixed establishment

Comments on C-333/20: The CJEU resolved the issue of a permanent establishment for VAT purposes

Comments on C-333/20: The two criteria of the ECJ to consider a Fixed Establishment

Having resources at a foreign subsidiary does not lead to a permanent establishment

Concept of a Fixed Establishment: The Austrian approach

Concept of a Fixed Establishment: The Polish approach

The EU approach on the concept of VAT FE, in particular through a subsidiary

Concept of a Fixed Establishment: the Belgian approach

Fixed Establishment: Foreign company was not liable for VAT on supplies of services relating to immovable property

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: CJEU ruling enhances legal certainty for taxpayers on VAT fixed establishment concept

Article: Is your subsidiary a fixed establishment in disguise?

Comments on C-333/20 – More clarity on the EU VAT concept of Fixed Establishment

Comments on C-333/20 – VAT fixed establishment in parent-subsidiary supplies

Extended practice of the tax authority to establish fixed establishments could lead to repayment over 100 million euros by ANAF

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Berlin Chemie judgment – Subsidiary is not a fixed establishment for VAT purposes

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Group company not a fixed establishment for VAT purposes, but CJEU has left the door open

Growing trend whereby a foreign parent company to have a fixed establishment in Belgium through its daughter company

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: No fixed establishment in the Berlin Chemie case according to Court of Justice of the EU

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Foreign subsidiary is not a permanent establishment for VAT

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Place of belonging. The Berlin Chemie A Menarini case

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Landmark CJEU ruling – Subsidiary rendering services to its parent is not a fixed establishment of the latter

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Place of belonging – The Berlin Chemie A Menarini case

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Relations between a parent company and its subsidiary: caution with the fixed establishment in VAT

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: CJEU Ruling on the Concept of Fixed Establishment for VAT Purposes

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Group company is not a permanent establishment for VAT, but the ECJ leaves the door ajar

Fixed Establishment For VAT Purposes

Relations between a parent company and its subsidiary: attention to the fixed establishment for VAT

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Experts believe that the ECJ ruling may change the restrictive approach of tax authorities to the issue of a VAT fixed establishment

Comments on C-333/20: In the absence of suitable structure, German pharmaceutical in Romania does not have Fixed Establishment

VAT and Fixed Establishments – An analysis by Francisco Javier Sánchez Gallardo

Comments on ECJ C-333/20 (Berlin Chemie): No VAT fixed establishment in the Berlin Chemie case

Comments on ECJ C-333/20: Subsidiary is not a permanent establishment for VAT purposes

Advertisements:

Contact:

Support & Info

Sign up for our newsletter