The Gujarat High Court, while upholding the validity of section 13(8)(b) read with Section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017 held that the service provided by intermediary in India cannot be treated as “export of services” under the IGST Act, 2017. It was observed that it is rightly included in Section 13(8) (b) of the IGST Act to consider the location of supplier of service as place of supply so as to attract CGST and SGST.
Source: taxscan.in
Latest Posts in "India"
- Supreme Court Rules: “Parts” Must Functionally Integrate into Machinery, Rejecting End-Use Claims
- Centre to Consider Panel’s GST Recommendations on Air Purifiers, Tells Delhi High Court
- Sunglasses Not Classified as Spectacles, Taxable at Higher 12.5% VAT: Punjab & Haryana HC
- BMW Urges No GST Hike on EVs as Electric Car Sales Surge Over 200% in 2025
- Supreme Court: Hostel Rooms for Students Qualify as Residential Dwellings, GST Exempt
