The Supreme Court recently considered whether a “BV” could deduct the VAT in respect of attorney’s fees from its shareholder. The Supreme Court finds that the Court of Appeal wrongly failed to pay attention to the BV’s argument that it had to purchase these services in connection with the continuation of its business activities. The case was referred back to the Den Bosch Court for further investigation of the facts.
Source: BDO NL
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Refund Request Denied Due to Late Submission: Court of Appeal Decision 2025
- Pension Fund’s Insurance Service Exempt from VAT; No Right to Input Tax Deduction
- VAT Assessment Upheld Due to Missing Invoices and Insufficient Proof for Deductions and Loans
- Fiscal Unity for VAT Due to Close Financial and Economic Ties Upheld by Court
- EU Court: Spain Must Grant VAT Exemption for Group-Provided Cleaning Services to Members
