AG Opinion
Having regard to the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court should reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) as follows:
Article 135(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a single supply of management services, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is provided by an IT platform belonging to a third-party provider to a fund management company and includes both special investment funds and other funds, does not fall within the scope of the exemption laid down in that provision.
Sources:
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on T-198/25 (G. Kft) – General Court Confirms Limits on VAT Adjustment After Tax Audit
- Tax Professionals Back VAT Fraud Measure, Urge Temporary Use
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 2 Judgments till July 7, 2026
- European Commission Issues Guidance on €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Imports Effective 1 July 2026
- ECJ & General Court VAT Cases decided in 2026













