VATupdate

Share this post on

ECJ C-7/20 – Hauptzollamt Münster – Questions – “import” of car from Turkey to Germany for private journeys for a few months

This case is about the “import” of car from Turkey to Germany for private journeys for a few months, and is relevant for VAT, customs and tariff classification.


Article in the EU VAT Directive

Article 71(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (Chargeable event and chargeability of VAT)

Article 71
1. Where, on entry into the Community, goods are placed under one of the arrangements or situations referred to in Articles 156, 276 and 277, or under temporary importation arrangements with total exemption from import duty, or under external transit arrangements, the chargeable event shall occur and VAT shall become chargeable only when the goods cease to be covered by those arrangements or situations.
However, where imported goods are subject to customs duties, to agricultural levies or to charges having equivalent effect established under a common policy, the chargeable event shall occur and VAT shall become chargeable when the chargeable event in respect of those duties occurs and those duties become chargeable.


Facts

  • The applicant resides in Germany.
  • In October 2017, he transferred his passenger car with a Turkish registration number from Turkey to Germany without reporting it to the customs office.
  • At a police check in Germany it was found that the car had been imported.
  • In March 2018, the applicant moved the car back to Turkey again, where he sold the car.
  • Defendant, the main customs office Münster imposed import duties and VAT on imports on the applicant.
  • The defendant takes the view that the applicant has unlawfully introduced the car into the customs territory of the European Union.
  • The applicant takes the view that there is no question of a taxable importation because he uses the car for a short period only as a means of transport for private journeys.
  • According to his own claims, he implicitly placed the car under the Temporary Import regime.
  • The question is whether Article 71(1) of the VAT Directive is to be interpreted as meaning that that the provision of Article 87(4) of Regulation 952/2013 applies by analogy to a VAT debt triggered by importation.

Questions

Is the second subparagraph of Article 71(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax 1 to be interpreted as meaning that Article 87(4) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 establishing the EU Customs Code 2 can be applied mutatis mutandis to the recovery of VAT (import turnover tax)?


AG Opinion


Decision


Personal comments/VATupdate 


Source


Similar ECJ cases


How did countries implement the case?  Your feedback appreciated!  Let us know


Newsletters

 

Sponsors:

VAT news

Advertisements:

  • vatcomsult