The appellant argued that it had lost it VAT invoices due to a move. After further consideration it was identified that the appellant had not kept his records in order and output tax had also been underdeclared. Furthermore, he had run a business in the past where records were not kept according to the required standard. For these reasons the alternative evidence was not allowed and HMRC upheld the assessment.
Source: deeksvat.co.uk
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing as of April 2029
- Policy paper – Plastic Packaging Tax: mass balance approach and removal of pre-consumer plastic
- VAT in the UK – A comprehensive up to date guide
- Autumn Budget 2025: Key VAT and Indirect Tax Changes Impacting UK Businesses and Charities
- VAT Exemption for Locum Doctors: Key Implications for NHS Trusts and Medical Providers
