VATupdate
I Love The Netherlands

Share this post on

Discriminatory requirement of tax representative does not stand in the way of zero VAT rate for excise goods

  • A Dutch BV, whose DGA lives abroad and operates an alcoholic beverage wholesale business entirely within a Dutch excise warehouse, was denied a zero VAT rate by the Tax and Customs Administration, which argued the BV was a foreign taxpayer without a permanent establishment and failed to appoint a tax representative or provide customer statements.
  • The Court of Appeal of The Hague agreed the BV lacked a permanent establishment in the Netherlands but ruled that the requirement for foreign taxpayers to appoint a tax representative was discriminatory.
  • The Court further determined that the zero rate could not be refused based on formal requirements (like appointing a representative or providing statements) when the substantive conditions (goods in excise warehouse, not released for consumption) were met, leading to the annulment of the additional tax assessments.

Source BTW Jurisprudentie



Sponsors:

Pincvision

Advertisements:

  • RTC