- The report analyzes the artificial interposition of “YY SA” to deduct input VAT for works on properties used by “XX SA” for teaching activities.
- “XX SA” cannot deduct input VAT because teaching is VAT-exempt.
- The arrangement is deemed artificial, with its only effect being to allow “YY SA” to claim VAT deductions that “XX SA” could not.
- The Advisory Commission concludes this constitutes a conflict in the application of the tax rule.
Source: sede.agenciatributaria.gob.es
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- Gibraltar Introduces Transaction Tax and Duty Changes Ahead of EU Customs Union Implementation
- Spain Tightens VAT Refund Rules for Non-EU Businesses, Impacting U.S. and Other Foreign Claimants
- Spanish Tax Authority Updates Modelo 303 VAT Return and Group Forms Effective February 2026
- AEAT Publishes Report on Artificial Company Use for VAT Deduction in Exempt Teaching Activities
- Tariff Preferences for Western Sahara Products: Customs Information Note 05/2026, February 9, 2026













