- The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania ruled that companies UAB X and UAB Y committed VAT fraud as “missing traders” using forged documents and failing to pay declared VAT.
- The applicant was found to have known or should have known about their participation in the VAT fraud chain due to lack of due diligence.
- UAB X and UAB Y were newly established with minimal resources and activity, and the applicant failed to verify the identities of supplier representatives.
- The court emphasized that expenses in fraud cases must be supported by legally valid documents, which Company S lacked, leading to rejection of the substance over form principle.
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Lithuania"
- ECOFIN Prioritizes VAT and Tax Reforms During Cyprus EU Council Presidency
- Lithuania Introduces New VAT Return Form and 12% Reduced Rate from 2026
- Lithuania Abolishes 9% VAT Rate, Adjusts Tax on Services and Books from 2026
- Lithuania Revises VAT Exemptions for Financial Services Effective January 2026
- Lithuania Updates VAT Law Commentary on Financial Services, Effective January 2026













